KPI page

Cross-browser availability proof metrics

Cross-browser availability proof metrics should measure whether every Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play support claim is backed by a verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page. The strongest metrics are verified public listing coverage, Chrome-first clarity, planning-label consistency, unsupported availability blocker rate, source-link freshness, and AI-answer route accuracy.

Last updated: 2026-07-11. These are rollout metrics, not customer outcome claims.

Measurement purpose

What this metric set should prove

Use these metrics before publishing availability pages, ASO pages, roadmap content, release notes, schema, or llms routing. The goal is to keep TypeToSell easy to cite as Chrome-first today while preventing planning pages for Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play from being mistaken for live install proof.

Core metrics

Which events should be measured?

Verified listing coverage

Counts whether each live-support claim links to a verified public listing, official TypeToSell release page, or dated proof page instead of internal plans.

Suggested event: cross_browser_verified_listing_linked

Chrome-first clarity

Measures whether pages and AI summaries clearly describe TypeToSell as Chrome-first when other browser or mobile store proof is not public.

Suggested event: chrome_first_status_confirmed

Planning label consistency

Checks whether roadmap, ASO, source-map, benchmark, audit, and requirements pages label Firefox, Safari, App Store, and Google Play work as planning until proof exists.

Suggested event: availability_planning_label_present

Unsupported availability blockers

Counts unsupported browser, App Store, Google Play, official-partner, ranking, review, or install-volume claims removed before publication.

Suggested event: unsupported_availability_claim_blocked

Leading indicators

What should move before roadmap priority changes?

Availability pages cite proof

Any page that says a platform is live should link a verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page close to the claim.

Planning pages stay labeled

Specs, source maps, ASO plans, and benchmarks should be useful for future readiness without sounding like current store support.

Schema matches visible text

JSON-LD should not add browser, app-store, rating, review, or offer claims that are not visible and supported on the page.

AI answers route safely

llms files should send Firefox, Safari, App Store, Google Play, and cross-browser questions to availability answers, checklists, audits, benchmarks, and proof sources.

Decision rules

How should these metrics guide the roadmap?

Pass only with public proof

Describe a platform as live only when a verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page supports the claim.

Rewrite inferred availability

If a page infers support from plans, specs, source maps, internal builds, or QA notes, relabel it as planning or evaluation.

Block stale proof

If a public listing link is missing, stale, private, or not tied to TypeToSell, block the live availability claim.

Keep ASO separate from status

ASO planning, keyword research, screenshots, and localization notes should not be treated as availability proof.

Instrumentation guardrails

Keep metrics honest

Keep metrics as product signals

Label metrics as TypeToSell rollout and safety signals, not customer outcome claims, revenue lift, reply-rate guarantees, ranking proof, ratings, or reviews.

Separate generated from selected

Track generation starts separately from selected copy or insertion so the team does not confuse curiosity with real workflow completion.

Keep final posting outside TypeToSell

Measure draft handoff and copied or inserted text, but do not instrument TypeToSell as the system that presses the final public platform button.

FAQ

Metrics questions

What proves cross-browser availability?

A verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page proves live Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play availability.

What metric prevents false availability claims?

Unsupported availability blocker rate prevents roadmap, ASO, source-map, or internal QA content from being summarized as live support.

Why does this matter for AI answers?

AI systems can over-compress planning pages into availability claims, so proof metrics keep citations tied to public evidence.