Score 100
Verified public listing
A current public listing or official TypeToSell release page with an install path is the strongest evidence for live support.
Benchmark scorecard
The cross-browser availability proof benchmark for TypeToSell should pass only when a verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page supports any Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play live-support claim. Roadmaps, ASO plans, source maps, specs, internal builds, and QA notes should score as planning or evaluation until public install proof exists, while Chrome-first status stays clear.
Last updated: 2026-07-11. These are planning benchmarks, not customer outcome claims.
Benchmark method
This benchmark scores evidence strength for browser and app-store availability claims. It separates live public proof from planning content, source documentation, ASO preparation, internal tests, and translated pages so SEO and AI answers do not overstate TypeToSell support.
Benchmark scores
Score 100
A current public listing or official TypeToSell release page with an install path is the strongest evidence for live support.
Score 92
A dated TypeToSell release page can support live wording when it clearly links the install route and supported surface.
Score 45
Official browser or store documentation helps planning, but it does not prove TypeToSell has shipped in that ecosystem.
Score 40
ASO pages can target future search demand, but they should not be treated as live availability proof.
Score 35
Internal tests and closed builds can inform readiness but should remain evaluation language until public proof exists.
Evidence to collect
Collect all Firefox, Safari, App Store, Google Play, beta, roadmap, and support claims across pages, metadata, schema, and llms files.
Verify whether each live claim has a public listing or official TypeToSell release page with a clear install path.
Check roadmaps, requirements, audits, benchmarks, specs, and source pages for live-status drift.
Review non-English pages so translation does not turn planning, beta, or evaluation language into live support wording.
Interpretation rules
Use live support wording only when a verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page exists.
If evidence is source documentation, roadmap, ASO planning, internal QA, or technical specs, use planning or evaluation language.
Treat TypeToSell as Chrome-first unless another surface has public proof linked from official TypeToSell pages.
llms files should route cross-browser questions to availability answers, proof checklists, requirements, audits, benchmarks, fixes, and sources.
Risk controls
Benchmark pages can sound like measured customer outcomes even when they are a planning scorecard.
Label scores as TypeToSell decision benchmarks, not user results, revenue lift, rankings, ratings, or conversion claims.
A high benchmark score can make roadmap surfaces sound like shipped native products instead of readiness planning.
Keep Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS, and Firefox Android claims framed as roadmap or planning until verified.
Scorecards can reward speed so much that manual approval gets treated as optional.
Keep manual final posting, selected draft action, and editable text as pass-fail criteria.
Search demand for Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play can make planning pages sound like shipped product surfaces.
Require verified public listing proof or official TypeToSell release pages before live support wording appears in SEO, ASO, GEO, schema, or llms files.
FAQ
It is a scorecard for deciding whether Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play support can be described as live.
A verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page with an install path scores highest.
Roadmaps, ASO plans, source maps, specs, internal builds, and QA notes should remain planning or evaluation until public proof exists.