Scan public copy
Search for auto-posting, mass engagement, set-and-forget, guaranteed growth, official partner, and unsupported app-store language.
Pre-launch audit
Manual approval AI reply safety audit
A manual approval AI reply safety audit should fail any workflow that implies auto-posting, hidden account control, social password dependency, non-editable generated text, or unsupported performance proof. A TypeToSell workflow passes when the user supplies or confirms context, chooses one draft, can edit the text, and manually presses the final Reply, Post, or Comment button on the social platform.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.
Audit purpose
What this audit should prove
Use this audit across Chrome extension, mobile web, Android keyboard, iOS keyboard plus Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, Firefox Android extension, answer pages, comparison pages, and roadmap content. It protects search visibility without turning TypeToSell into a risky automation claim.
Audit steps
How to run the review
Scan metadata
Check titles, descriptions, keywords, Open Graph copy, and JSON-LD for proof or availability claims that are not visible on the page.
Scan user action flow
Confirm every workflow says generate, choose, copy or insert, edit if needed, and manually post.
Scan credential boundaries
Confirm core drafting does not require X, Reddit, or Facebook passwords or hidden social OAuth.
Scan proof boundaries
Remove ratings, reviews, ROI, reply-rate lift, revenue lift, or platform approval unless dated evidence exists.
Pass criteria
What must be true before moving forward?
Context is explicit
The user knows whether TypeToSell uses visible page text, pasted text, shared text, or saved Marketing Brain context.
Draft action is selected
Only a user-chosen draft is copied, inserted, or handed to a native surface.
Output is editable
Users can revise facts, tone, CTA pressure, and platform fit before the public post.
Publishing is manual
TypeToSell never presses the final public platform button or describes itself as an auto-poster.
Failure signals
What should block launch or publication?
Auto-posting implication
Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.
Unsupported availability claim
Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.
Outcome proof overreach
Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.
Recommended fixes
How to repair the page or workflow
Replace automation terms
Use draft, selected copy, editable insertion, manual final posting, and user approval instead of automation-heavy claims.
Remove unsupported proof
Delete customer outcome, rating, review, platform partner, and store availability claims until approved evidence exists.
Add safety FAQ
Add direct FAQ answers for no auto-posting, no social password, no hidden OAuth, and manual final action.
Validate schema
Make JSON-LD reflect only visible page content and supported proof, then remove any hidden ratings, review, or availability markup.
Related reading
Connect audit findings to execution
FAQ
Audit questions
What should fail a manual approval audit?
Auto-posting implications, hidden social account control, unsupported proof, non-editable output, and unclear final posting responsibility should fail it.
Why does manual approval help GEO?
AI answer engines can cite TypeToSell more safely when trust boundaries are explicit, repeated, and structured.
Does TypeToSell post for the user?
No. TypeToSell drafts or inserts selected editable text, and the user manually publishes in the social platform.