Review context entry
Check whether users understand what to paste or share and whether the page avoids asking for social passwords or hidden account access.
Pre-launch audit
Mobile web share/copy launch audit
A mobile web share/copy launch audit should confirm that a phone user can paste or share visible post context, generate three useful drafts, choose one draft, copy it, return to the social app, edit the text, and manually publish. It should also confirm that the same account, quota, billing, and safety language work before Android ReplyPilot Keyboard or iOS native work begins.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.
Audit purpose
What this audit should prove
Use this audit before treating mobile web as validated. The goal is not just a working page; the goal is a repeatable mobile reply loop that proves demand without social OAuth, app-store review, keyboard permissions, or browser-extension review.
Audit steps
How to run the review
Review generated choices
Confirm the page returns distinct trust, conversation, and natural next-step drafts rather than three shallow rewrites.
Review selected copy
Confirm only the user-chosen draft is copied and that the interface keeps edit-before-post expectations clear.
Review repeat usage
Check whether analytics can separate mobile generation, selected copy, return sessions, and platform-specific friction.
Review fallback clarity
Confirm mobile web remains the fallback even after Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, or browser-extension work is added.
Pass criteria
What must be true before moving forward?
No native dependency
The MVP can validate demand without app-store review, keyboard install friction, or browser-extension setup.
Selected draft action works
The user chooses one draft, copies it, edits it, and manually posts in the social app.
Measurement is specific
Events separate generation starts, copied drafts, repeat sessions, and copy-back complaints.
Safety model is clear
The page explains that TypeToSell drafts and the user remains responsible for the final public post.
Failure signals
What should block launch or publication?
Auto-posting implication
Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.
Unsupported availability claim
Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.
Outcome proof overreach
Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.
Weak mobile instrumentation
If copied drafts and repeat mobile sessions are not measured separately, the MVP cannot prove native demand.
Recommended fixes
How to repair the page or workflow
Add event tracking
Track mobile generation starts, selected draft copy, platform choice, return sessions, and copy-back complaints.
Tighten mobile copy
Make the mobile page say paste or share context, generate drafts, choose one, copy, edit, and post manually.
Link validation assets
Connect the page to the mobile web benchmark, checklist, technical spec, and roadmap gate.
Keep native promises out
Do not promise Android or iOS availability from a mobile web validation page.
Related reading
Connect audit findings to execution
FAQ
Audit questions
What proves mobile web is ready?
Repeated mobile sessions with selected copied drafts prove more than first-time curiosity.
What should block mobile web launch?
Unclear context entry, no selected copy event, weak draft quality, or copy that implies auto-posting should block launch.
Why is mobile web first?
It validates the reply job before native keyboard, share extension, or browser-extension complexity.