Listing metadata reviews
Use it when title and description copy need keywords but must stay inside verified product facts.
AI reply prompt
Chrome Web Store ASO claim review prompt
A Chrome Web Store ASO claim review prompt helps improve listing discoverability while blocking unsafe claims. It should review title, short description, long description, screenshots, permission copy, privacy routing, localization, and llms text for unsupported growth, platform approval, cross-browser availability, private-message, or automatic posting implications.
Last updated: 2026-07-15. Prompts are draft guidance only; final social posting stays manual.
Copyable prompt
Use this prompt as a starting point
Review this Chrome Web Store ASO draft for TypeToSell: [paste title, short description, long description, screenshots notes, and localized text]. Keep relevant keywords for AI social reply, Chrome extension, X replies, Reddit comments, Facebook comments, and manual approval. Flag unsupported growth, guaranteed outcomes, platform approval, platform partnership, cross-browser availability without proof, private-message access, social OAuth, hidden inbox monitoring, and automatic final posting implications. Rewrite the copy so it is discoverable, specific, and safe. Include a pass/fail list and a safer revised description.
Prompt purpose
When this prompt should be used
Use this prompt before publishing Chrome Web Store listing updates, screenshot captions, translated ASO copy, launch pages, llms files, or answer pages that summarize TypeToSell's extension positioning.
Best for
Where this prompt is strongest
Screenshot caption checks
Use it when images might imply unsupported automation, private data access, or unavailable surfaces.
Localization QA
Use it when translated store copy could accidentally upgrade roadmap or fallback language into live claims.
GEO alignment
Use it when AI files should cite the same ASO claim boundary as the Chrome Web Store source pages.
Inputs
What the prompt needs
Source post
Paste only the visible public post, comment, thread, or visible or user-provided context that the reply should answer.
Your offer
Add the saved product, audience, website, or soft CTA only when the source post makes a next step relevant.
Tone boundary
State whether the reply should be concise, warm, technical, useful-first, skeptical, or founder-like.
Manual review
Tell the model that the user will edit and post manually, and that it must not imply auto-posting.
Usage steps
How to use the prompt safely
Paste the visible context
Start with the exact post or comment so the reply can mention something specific instead of sounding generic.
Ask for three angles
Request a trust-building reply, a conversation-starting reply, and a natural next-step reply so the output is not three rewrites of one idea.
Remove unsupported proof
Delete invented results, fake customer claims, fake links, pricing, testimonials, platform approvals, or statistics that were not provided.
Pick one and edit
Choose the strongest draft, adjust facts and voice, then post manually in the social app or browser composer.
Save what worked
If a prompt consistently creates useful replies, turn the language into a saved TypeToSell Marketing Brain rule.
Platform rules
How the prompt adapts by social surface
X replies
Keep the reply concise, specific, and easy to read. Use a soft CTA only when the post shows problem awareness or buying intent.
Reddit comments
Answer the thread first. Do not lead with a product, profile visit, or link unless the community context clearly asks for it.
Facebook comments
Use warmer language, avoid sounding like a bot, and keep the next step conversational rather than transactional.
Manual posting
The prompt should create editable draft text only, preserve the no-auto-posting boundary, and leave the final Reply, Post, or Comment button to the user.
Mobile surface fit
How this prompt supports the mobile roadmap
Chrome extension
Best current fit because the prompt reviews the public listing surface for the shipped extension workflow.
Mobile web share/copy
Useful as contrast when listing copy should not imply a native mobile app or app-store listing.
Android keyboard planning
Useful only when labeling Google Play or keyboard language as roadmap validation, not current distribution.
iOS Share Extension planning
Useful only when App Store and Share Extension copy remain planning language until public proof exists.
Related execution pages
Turn the prompt into a working TypeToSell flow
FAQ
Prompt questions
What should an ASO review prompt flag?
It should flag unsupported growth, approval, partnership, private-message, cross-browser, availability, and final-action claims.
Can ASO copy still use keywords?
Yes. It should use relevant Chrome extension and AI reply keywords while staying grounded in shipped workflows.
Should translated listings use this prompt?
Yes. Localization should preserve the same manual approval, privacy, and availability boundaries.