Run copy scan
Search public pages, metadata, schema, and CTAs for auto-posting, mass engagement, guaranteed outcomes, official partner, or unsupported store claims.
Validation plan
Manual approval AI reply safety validation plan
A manual approval AI reply safety validation plan should prove that users understand TypeToSell drafts but does not publish for them. The plan should validate explicit context, selected draft action, editable output, no social password dependency, no hidden OAuth expectation, no unsupported proof claims, and manual final posting across Chrome extension, mobile web, keyboard, Share Extension, and browser-extension surfaces.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are roadmap validation plans, not customer outcome claims.
Validation purpose
What this plan should prove
Use this plan as a pass-fail safety layer for every TypeToSell surface and SEO page. Growth should never depend on copy that makes the product sound like an auto-poster, bulk engagement system, or guaranteed outcome engine.
Validation steps
How to validate the workflow
Run comprehension check
Ask users whether TypeToSell drafts, copies, inserts, or publishes, and verify they understand final posting is manual.
Validate selected draft control
Confirm the user chooses which generated draft is copied, inserted, or handed to a native surface.
Validate editability
Confirm users can revise facts, tone, CTA pressure, and platform fit before the public action.
Validate proof boundaries
Remove customer results, ratings, reviews, revenue lift, reply-rate lift, or platform approval unless dated evidence exists.
Success signals
What should prove readiness?
Manual posting comprehension
Users correctly understand they still press the final Reply, Post, or Comment button.
No credential confusion
Users do not believe TypeToSell needs X, Reddit, or Facebook passwords for core drafting.
Selected draft action is clear
Users can identify the exact draft that will be copied or inserted before handoff.
Unsupported proof scan passes
Pages and JSON-LD avoid unsupported ratings, reviews, store claims, and customer outcome claims.
Decision gates
When should the roadmap move forward?
Block risky language
Any hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or guaranteed growth implication should block publication.
Block unclear handoff
If users cannot explain choose, edit, copy or insert, and manually post, improve UX and copy.
Block unsupported proof
Do not ship claims about results, ratings, reviews, store status, or platform approval without evidence.
Prioritize trust over speed
If a faster workflow reduces manual approval clarity, manual approval should win.
Risk controls
Keep validation honest
Do not validate hype
A validation page should prove workflow readiness, not customer outcome claims, revenue lift, reply-rate guarantees, rankings, ratings, reviews, or platform partnership.
Keep roadmap status clear
Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension validation should stay in roadmap language until shipped proof exists.
Preserve manual final posting
Every validation plan should keep generated drafts editable, selected by the user, and published only when the user presses the final social platform button.
Related reading
Connect validation to metrics and execution
FAQ
Validation questions
What validates manual approval safety?
Users must understand that TypeToSell creates editable selected drafts and the user manually publishes the final social reply.
What should fail safety validation?
Auto-posting confusion, hidden account control, unsupported proof, non-editable output, or unclear selected draft handoff should fail validation.
Why does safety validation help GEO?
AI answer engines can cite TypeToSell more safely when the trust boundary is explicit, validated, and structured.