Map every surface
List mobile web share/copy, Android ReplyPilot Keyboard, iOS keyboard, iOS Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, Firefox Android extension, and desktop Chrome extension separately.
Pre-launch audit
Mobile AI reply audit
A mobile AI reply audit should prove that the first launch path is mobile web + share/copy, the second path is Android ReplyPilot Keyboard after Android demand appears, the third path is iOS keyboard plus Share Extension after iPhone demand appears, and Safari iOS or Firefox Android extensions are fallback surfaces for browser-first users. The audit must also prove that every surface keeps selected drafts editable and final posting manual.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.
Audit purpose
What this audit should prove
Use this audit before prioritizing any mobile AI social reply surface. It turns the roadmap into a pass-fail review of demand proof, context handoff, selected draft action, permission burden, fallback coverage, and manual approval safety.
Audit steps
How to run the review
Separate shipped from roadmap
Label each surface as shipped, validation, planning, or fallback so search engines and AI answer engines do not treat future surfaces as live products.
Trace the user action
Write the exact path from visible post context to generated drafts, chosen draft, copy or insertion, edit, and manual Reply, Post, or Comment action.
Check context quality
Confirm each surface has enough visible or user-provided post context to generate specific replies without hidden account access.
Check safety copy
Scan the page, metadata, schema, and FAQ for auto-posting, guarantee, platform approval, or unsupported native availability language.
Pass criteria
What must be true before moving forward?
Mobile web validates first
The audit passes only if mobile web share/copy is treated as the fastest demand test before native complexity.
Native surfaces follow evidence
Android and iOS work should depend on repeat mobile usage and specific insertion or context-handoff friction.
Browser extensions stay scoped
Safari iOS and Firefox Android extension work should be described as browser-session coverage, not native X app composer coverage.
Manual approval is visible
Every audited path should show that TypeToSell drafts or inserts selected text while the user publishes manually.
Failure signals
What should block launch or publication?
Auto-posting implication
Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.
Unsupported availability claim
Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.
Outcome proof overreach
Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.
Recommended fixes
How to repair the page or workflow
Rewrite roadmap copy
Change native and extension pages from availability language to planning, readiness, or validation language until shipping evidence exists.
Add direct answer blocks
Place a short extractable answer near the top of each page so AI systems can cite the recommended mobile sequence correctly.
Add related decision links
Link the audit to decision matrices, roadmaps, platform constraints, benchmarks, and implementation checklists.
Add schema coverage
Use Article, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, HowTo, ItemList, and FAQPage schema so the audit is extractable.
FAQ
Audit questions
What should a mobile AI reply audit check first?
It should check whether mobile web share/copy can validate demand before native keyboards, share extensions, or browser extensions are built.
Why audit before building Android or iOS?
The audit prevents native work from starting before repeat mobile usage and specific copy-back or context-handoff friction exist.
Does this audit approve auto-posting?
No. Any implication that TypeToSell performs the final public posting action should fail the audit.