Pre-launch audit

Android ReplyPilot Keyboard readiness audit

An Android ReplyPilot Keyboard readiness audit should happen after mobile web proves Android demand. The audit passes when Android users repeatedly generate and copy drafts, complain specifically about app switching or insertion, understand the keyboard privacy boundary, keep mobile web fallback, use shared server-side entitlement, insert only selected editable drafts, and still press the final social platform button manually.

Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.

Audit purpose

What this audit should prove

Use this audit before starting or publishing Android keyboard roadmap copy. It prevents the team from building native insertion before demand, permission trust, quota reuse, revoke behavior, and no-auto-posting boundaries are ready.

Audit steps

How to run the review

Segment Android demand

Separate Android mobile web generation, copied drafts, and repeat sessions from total mobile traffic.

Identify keyboard-shaped friction

Look for complaints about switching apps, copying back, or insertion speed rather than generic draft quality.

Audit permission language

Check whether users can understand what the keyboard can read, what it sends, and what remains under their control.

Audit entitlement reuse

Confirm account, quota, billing, session revoke, and rate-limit behavior stay server-side.

Audit insertion safety

Confirm the keyboard inserts only a selected editable draft and never triggers the public posting action.

Pass criteria

What must be true before moving forward?

Demand is Android-specific

Android users should already show repeat mobile web behavior before keyboard scope is justified.

Permission copy is plain

The page should explain the keyboard boundary without vague privacy promises or hidden access claims.

Fallback remains mobile web

Users should still be able to use mobile web when keyboard install or trust is not ready.

Roadmap status is honest

This audit is planning content and should not be treated as current Google Play availability.

Failure signals

What should block launch or publication?

Auto-posting implication

Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.

Unsupported availability claim

Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.

Outcome proof overreach

Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.

Recommended fixes

How to repair the page or workflow

Add Android evidence gate

Require repeat Android mobile web sessions and selected copy events before keyboard build priority.

Rewrite permission copy

Say exactly what the keyboard uses, what it does not use, and how the final post remains manual.

Connect fallback pages

Link Android keyboard pages to mobile web MVP, platform constraints, requirements, and migration content.

Remove availability overclaim

Replace launch-store language with readiness, validation, or roadmap language until verified.

FAQ

Audit questions

When should Android keyboard be audited?

After Android mobile web users show repeated use and specific copy-back or insertion friction.

What fails the Android audit?

Unsupported availability language, unclear keyboard permissions, hidden account control, or auto-posting implications should fail it.

Is Android ReplyPilot Keyboard live?

This audit is roadmap planning and should not be treated as current Google Play availability.