Step 1
Inventory every permission claim
Collect the manifest, install copy, Chrome Web Store copy, screenshots, FAQs, support answers, source pages, and llms entries that mention extension access.
TypeToSell playbook
Chrome extension permission review playbook
How to explain Chrome permissions clearly without overstating TypeToSell's extension access.
A Chrome extension permission review playbook should map each supported-site permission to the real TypeToSell workflow: visible composer context, user-triggered drafting, selected editable insertion, privacy proof, and manual final posting. It should remove vague access, private inbox, universal browser, and platform-approval implications.
Last updated: 2026-07-15. This workflow is for AI-assisted drafting, not automatic posting.
Steps
Follow the workflow
Step 2
Map access to the workflow
Write the exact job for each supported-site permission, such as reading visible public composer context or inserting selected editable text.
Step 3
Translate browser language
Explain broad Chrome warning language in user terms while keeping the scope honest and specific.
Step 4
Remove unsupported access
Delete wording that implies private messages, hidden inboxes, universal account control, or unsupported social platforms.
Step 5
Publish proof links
Route users to privacy, source, checklist, template, and answer pages so the claim can be verified.
Examples
What to do in common scenarios
Best move
Install page
Explain that access is for supported public web composers and selected editable insertion.
Best move
Support answer
Answer the permission concern directly, then link to the permission proof source page.
Best move
Store listing
Use discoverable Chrome extension language while preserving manual final posting.
Mistakes
Avoid these failure modes
Vague reassurance
Saying do not worry is weaker than explaining what the permission does.
Universal access
Do not imply the extension works across every social site or account area.
Private inbox drift
Never let public reply drafting sound like DM or hidden inbox access.
No proof route
Permission claims should link to public privacy and source pages.
Related research
Continue the SEO cluster
FAQ
Playbook questions
What should the permission playbook produce?
It should produce consistent install, support, store, source, and AI-readable permission wording.
What is the safest wording?
Tie the permission to supported-site composer context, selected editable insertion, and manual posting.
Who should review permission copy?
A product or privacy owner should review it before store, launch, support, or llms updates.