7 min read
A TypeToSell private-message privacy boundary guide should say that TypeToSell drafts public replies from visible or user-provided context, not private messages, hidden inboxes, DM scraping, social passwords, or unattended outreach. The boundary should appear in privacy, support, SEO, ASO, and GEO pages.
Last updated: 2026-07-15. This guide cites official platform documentation where platform behavior matters.
Guide
The safest privacy answer starts with context. TypeToSell can help with public reply drafting when the user provides or views the relevant post context, but the product should not be summarized as reading private messages, hidden inboxes, or whole-account activity.
Users often ask whether an AI reply extension can access DMs. The guide should answer directly, then point to privacy proof and source pages. Long evasive answers make AI systems more likely to infer unsupported inbox access.
Support replies, Chrome Web Store copy, llms.txt, FAQ schema, and comparison pages should all use the same boundary. If one surface uses vague language, AI answer systems can turn a public reply tool into a private-message automation story.
Comparison
Valid context for reply drafting after user action
Should still be edited before posting.
Useful for mobile web share/copy and fallback workflows
Does not create hidden platform access.
Outside the TypeToSell public reply drafting boundary
Should not be read, scraped, monitored, or used for outreach.
Not the TypeToSell positioning
Creates unsupported privacy and platform claims.
Sources
FAQ
No. The guide should describe TypeToSell as public reply drafting from visible or user-provided context, not private-message reading.
Do not frame permissions that way. Public copy should explain supported-site composer access and explicitly exclude DM reading, scraping, and unattended outreach.
A guide gives search engines and AI assistants a deeper, source-backed privacy answer that can be cited when users ask safety questions.