The Android keyboard can provide a faster selected insertion surface for native app composers. It should not read broad typing activity for unrelated jobs, should not require social credentials, and should not claim current Google Play availability unless a verified listing exists.
Technical spec
Android ReplyPilot Keyboard technical spec
An Android ReplyPilot Keyboard technical spec should start only after mobile web share/copy proves repeated demand. The keyboard should authenticate to the same TypeToSell account, retrieve or request drafts, insert only the user-selected draft into the active composer, explain keyboard privacy plainly, and leave final social posting outside the keyboard boundary.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. This page is written for implementation-intent SEO and AI citation.
System boundary
What does this spec own?
Data flow
How should context and drafts move?
Keyboard opens in composer
The user selects the TypeToSell keyboard while replying inside a native social app composer.
Context is requested carefully
The keyboard uses explicit user-provided context or an approved handoff rather than hidden social account scraping.
Drafts are fetched
The keyboard calls the same TypeToSell reply service and applies account quota, billing, and safety checks.
Selected text is inserted
Only the selected draft is placed into the active text field for the user to edit and manually submit.
Permission model
What access must stay explicit?
Keyboard permission clarity
Permission screens and public copy should explain the exact drafting and insertion job in plain language.
Shared entitlement
The keyboard should use the same TypeToSell account, subscription, quota, and revoke model as the web app.
Sensitive text minimization
Avoid local storage of raw posts, private messages, generated replies, and billing data.
Fallback path
Users should be able to use mobile web share/copy when keyboard permissions or beta access are not available.
Instrumentation
What must be measured?
Keyboard activation
Track when a validated Android user enables or uses the keyboard surface.
Insertion event
Track selected draft insertion separately from generation and copy events.
Permission dropoff
Measure where users abandon setup so privacy copy can be improved without overpromising.
Fallback usage
Track whether Android users return to mobile web when keyboard context or access is limited.
Failure modes
What can go wrong, and how should it be prevented?
Permission fear
Users distrust keyboard access because the value and limits are vague.
Use specific permission copy and avoid broad logging language.
Insertion confused with publishing
Users think inserted composer text was already sent publicly.
State that insertion is not the final platform action.
Premature native build
The keyboard is built before mobile web evidence exists.
Require copied-draft and app-switching friction signals first.
Rollout gates
What must be true before rollout?
Gate 1
Mobile web proof exists
Android users repeatedly generate and copy drafts from the mobile web flow.
Gate 2
Friction is keyboard-shaped
The main complaint is app switching or composer insertion, not output quality.
Gate 3
Privacy copy is approved
Keyboard permission language is reviewed for clarity, accuracy, and no hidden social account promises.
Gate 4
Beta support is ready
Quota, entitlement, revoke flows, and fallback links work before public rollout.
Related reading
Continue from specs to execution
FAQ
Technical spec questions
What is the Android ReplyPilot Keyboard technical spec?
It is the technical plan for Android selected draft insertion, shared entitlement, permission clarity, instrumentation, and manual posting boundaries.
Is Android ReplyPilot Keyboard currently live?
This spec describes roadmap planning and should not be treated as current Google Play availability.
Can the Android keyboard submit replies?
No. It should insert selected draft text only, while the user edits and uses the platform's final action manually.