Score 5
Android mobile web proof
Android users should already generate and copy drafts from mobile web before keyboard work begins.
Benchmark scorecard
Android ReplyPilot Keyboard readiness benchmark
The Android ReplyPilot Keyboard readiness benchmark should pass only after mobile web proves Android demand. The strongest readiness signals are repeated Android mobile sessions, copied drafts, user complaints about app switching or insertion, clear keyboard permission comprehension, shared entitlement readiness, selected insertion, editable text, and manual final posting.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are planning benchmarks, not customer outcome claims.
Benchmark method
How this scorecard should be read
This benchmark scores Android keyboard readiness across demand proof, keyboard-shaped friction, permission trust, server-side entitlement, device ledger minimization, and manual approval preservation.
Benchmark scores
Scorecard
Score 5
Keyboard-shaped friction
Users should complain about app switching or insertion, not only draft quality.
Score 4
Permission clarity
Users must understand what the keyboard does, what it does not read, and why mobile web fallback remains available.
Score 5
Shared entitlement readiness
Account, quota, billing, rate-limit, and revoke logic should stay server-side.
Score 5
Selected insertion safety
The keyboard inserts only the chosen draft into the composer and never triggers the platform's public posting action.
Evidence to collect
What data should prove readiness?
Android segment size
Measure Android users separately from total mobile web traffic.
Copy-back complaint count
Tag support notes and surveys that mention switching apps or insertion speed.
Permission explanation test
Check whether users can describe the keyboard's privacy boundary.
Revoke and quota checks
Verify entitlement and session controls before native rollout.
Interpretation rules
How should the benchmark guide the roadmap?
Build after proof
Start Android keyboard only after mobile web has repeat Android usage.
Delay if trust is unclear
If permission anxiety is high, improve copy and keep mobile web fallback.
Do not solve output with native
If draft quality is the complaint, improve Marketing Brain and reply generation first.
Keep current-status copy honest
Describe Android keyboard as roadmap planning unless Google Play availability is verified.
Risk controls
Keep benchmark pages honest
Fake performance proof
Benchmark pages can sound like measured customer outcomes even when they are a planning scorecard.
Label scores as TypeToSell decision benchmarks, not user results, revenue lift, rankings, ratings, or conversion claims.
Native availability drift
A high benchmark score can make roadmap surfaces sound like shipped native products instead of readiness planning.
Keep Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS, and Firefox Android claims framed as roadmap or planning until verified.
Automation pressure
Scorecards can reward speed so much that manual approval gets treated as optional.
Keep manual final posting, selected draft action, and editable text as pass-fail criteria.
Related reading
Connect benchmark evidence to execution
Android ReplyPilot Keyboard/mobile/android-replypilot-keyboardAndroid platform constraints/platforms/android-replypilot-keyboard-platform-constraintsAndroid technical spec/specs/android-replypilot-keyboard-technical-specAndroid keyboard migration/migrations/mobile-web-to-android-replypilot-keyboard-migration
FAQ
Benchmark questions
When is Android ReplyPilot Keyboard ready?
When Android mobile web usage is proven and users specifically need less app switching or faster native insertion.
Is Android ReplyPilot Keyboard live today?
This benchmark is roadmap planning and should not be treated as current Google Play availability.
What should the keyboard never do?
It should never auto-post or control the user's final social platform action.