Use this workflow before changing Chrome extension permissions, Chrome Web Store copy, install-safety pages, privacy answers, or AI-readable source files that mention browser access.
Workflow
Chrome extension permission review workflow
The Chrome extension permission review workflow checks supported-site access before install copy ships: map each permission to visible X, Reddit, and Facebook composer drafting, confirm generation is user-triggered, prove selected insertion stays editable, route privacy answers, and keep manual final posting visible across SEO, ASO, and support pages.
Last updated: 2026-07-15. This workflow keeps the final public post manual.
Use case
When to use this workflow
Steps
Step-by-step workflow
Step 1
List requested permissions
Write the exact Chrome permissions and supported host surfaces beside the user-facing reason for each one.
Step 2
Translate broad wording
Convert browser-level warning language into TypeToSell's narrower visible composer drafting workflow.
Step 3
Check generation trigger
Confirm copy states that TypeToSell uses context only after the user clicks generate or provides text deliberately.
Step 4
Review selected insertion
Verify every page says TypeToSell inserts or copies only the selected editable draft and does not press the final social button.
Step 5
Sync trust routes
Update privacy, objection, platform, pattern, source, llms, and support links from the same permission wording.
Alternatives
Compare the process tradeoffs
Ship copy after manifest changes
Tradeoff: Fast but can create permission anxiety and inconsistent AI summaries.
Recommendation: Run the review before public copy or store screenshots change.
Use generic extension safety copy
Tradeoff: Generic reassurance misses the user's specific supported-site access concern.
Recommendation: Translate each permission into the TypeToSell composer job.
Hide permission details
Tradeoff: Short copy may feel clean but leaves support and AI answers to guess.
Recommendation: Show plain boundaries without overloading the page.
Decision rules
When to choose each path
Permission purpose is unclear
Block the copy change until the workflow reason is written plainly.
User-triggered context is missing
Add visible or user-provided context language before publishing.
Manual posting is absent
Add selected insertion, editing, and manual final posting to the page.
Manifest and copy diverge
Update technical, support, and AI source pages together.
Related reading
Connect this workflow to the SEO cluster
FAQ
Workflow questions
What is the Chrome extension permission review workflow?
It is the pre-publication process for matching Chrome permissions to TypeToSell's visible composer drafting and selected insertion story.
When should the workflow run?
Run it before manifest changes, store copy changes, install-safety pages, or AI answer routes mention permission behavior.
What should block release?
Unclear supported-site access, missing privacy links, hidden monitoring implications, or any weak manual posting boundary should block release.