Copyable template library

Manual approval reply review template

A manual approval reply review template checks whether the AI draft uses visible context, avoids invented proof, keeps the CTA optional, and leaves final posting to the user. Use it before copying, inserting, or manually posting any AI-generated reply on X, Reddit, or Facebook.

Last updated: July 12, 2026. Templates are editable starting points, not auto-posted replies.

Template groups

Copy the structure, then add the real post context

Use before a draft leaves TypeToSell or any AI assistant.

Approval checklist

Visible context used: [yes/no]. Specific detail included: [detail]. Unsupported claims removed: [yes/no].

CTA pressure: [none/soft/too high]. Buyer stage: [cold/problem-aware/buyer-intent].

Final action: user edits and manually presses Reply, Post, or Comment.

Use when a draft is generic, spammy, or overconfident.

Rewrite instruction

Rewrite this as useful-first. Remove hard CTA pressure and add one specific observation from the source post.

Make this safer for [platform]. Remove invented proof, guaranteed outcomes, and auto-posting implications.

Create three options: trust, conversation, natural next step. Keep each editable and manually posted.

Use when the draft should not be posted yet.

Blocker note

Do not post yet: source context is missing, so the draft may be guessing.

Do not post yet: this mentions [claim] without visible proof in Marketing Brain.

Do not post yet: this sounds like automation or bulk engagement instead of a manual reply.

Usage steps

How to use these templates safely

Start with the source post

Read the visible post, comment, or thread first. A template should shape the reply, not replace context.

Choose one intent

Pick trust, conversation, soft CTA, or manual approval instead of blending every goal into one generic reply.

Replace every bracket

Swap placeholders for a specific observation, objection, audience, problem, example, or natural next step.

Post manually

TypeToSell can draft, copy, or insert selected editable text, but the user still presses Reply, Post, or Comment manually.

Mobile fit

Where this template belongs in the mobile roadmap

Mobile web + share/copy

Use the template to shorten phone drafts and prove selected copy behavior before native keyboard work.

Android ReplyPilot Keyboard

Use template slots as insertion patterns only after Android users already choose useful drafts and want less copy-back friction.

iOS keyboard + Share Extension

Use templates to separate source context handoff from selected draft placement, with copy fallback kept valid.

Safari iOS and Firefox Android

Use templates as browser-session fallback content; do not treat them as proof that native app composers are solved.

Quick answers

Template questions

What should manual approval catch?

It should catch missing context, invented proof, excessive CTA pressure, and unclear final posting responsibility.

Who posts the final reply?

The user does. TypeToSell can draft, copy, or insert selected editable text only.

Should review templates mention guarantees?

No. Avoid guaranteed leads, revenue, rankings, replies, or follower claims.