Support users who prefer mobile browser social sessions without confusing browser extension work with native app keyboard or Share Extension workflows.
Product requirements
Mobile browser extension requirements
Mobile browser extension requirements for Safari iOS and Firefox Android should come after mobile web, Android keyboard, and iOS keyboard plus Share Extension validation. They should serve browser-first social reply users, prove context capture feasibility, keep copy fallback when insertion is limited, and avoid pretending to solve native app composer workflows.
Last updated: July 11, 2026. This page is written for PRD-intent SEO and AI citation.
Product goal
What should this requirement set accomplish?
Functional requirements
What must the product do?
Browser-first detection
The team can identify users who reply from Safari iOS or Firefox Android browser sessions.
Visible page context
The extension can capture or help transfer enough visible page context to draft useful replies.
Copy or insertion path
The browser flow supports selected draft copy or insertion depending on platform capability.
Mobile web fallback
Users can fall back to mobile web share/copy when extension APIs are limited.
Acceptance criteria
What must be true before this is ready?
Criterion 1
Segment is real
Support requests, interviews, or analytics show meaningful browser-first mobile replying.
Criterion 2
Native app mismatch is stated
The page explains that browser extensions do not replace native app keyboard workflows.
Criterion 3
Permission story is clear
Users understand why a browser extension needs page access.
Criterion 4
Manual final posting remains
The user reviews, edits, and manually publishes the final social reply.
Non-functional requirements
What quality bars must hold?
Browser-specific feasibility
Safari iOS and Firefox Android behavior should be evaluated separately, not copied from desktop Chrome assumptions.
Maintenance control
Do not add browser-specific support until the segment justifies ongoing QA and review work.
Roadmap honesty
Unshipped browser extensions should be labeled as evaluation or roadmap items.
Safety parity
Browser extension copy should match TypeToSell's no social password and no auto-posting promise.
Out of scope
What should not be built or claimed?
First mobile MVP
Mobile browser extensions should not replace the mobile web share/copy MVP.
Native composer replacement
Browser extensions should not be described as solving native X app composer insertion.
Automatic posting
The extension should not submit social replies on behalf of the user.
Related reading
Continue from requirements to execution
Mobile browser extension checklist/checklists/safari-ios-firefox-android-extension-checklistMobile browser extension priority matrix/matrices/mobile-browser-extension-priority-matrixMobile browser extension roadmap/roadmaps/safari-ios-firefox-android-extension-roadmapMobile browser extension examples/examples/mobile-browser-extension-reply-examples
FAQ
Requirement questions
When should mobile browser extension requirements be used?
Use them after research shows real Safari iOS or Firefox Android browser-first replying.
Do mobile browser extensions replace mobile web?
No. Mobile web should remain the broad fallback and first validation path.
Do browser extensions replace ReplyPilot Keyboard?
No. Browser extensions help browser pages, while keyboards help native mobile app composers.