Score 92
Listing metadata fit
Title, summary, category, and support text describe Chrome-first AI social reply drafting without inflating the product scope.
Benchmark scorecard
Chrome Web Store ASO claims benchmark
The Chrome Web Store ASO claims benchmark for TypeToSell should pass when listing metadata, screenshots, permission copy, privacy links, website pages, localized copy, and llms routing all repeat the same safe facts. A strong benchmark improves discovery for AI social reply and Chrome extension searches without unsupported growth, rankings, ratings, reviews, install totals, official partnership, cross-browser status, or auto-posting claims.
Last updated: 2026-07-11. These are planning benchmarks, not customer outcome claims.
Benchmark method
How this scorecard should be read
This benchmark scores ASO claim discipline, not store ranking results. It reviews listing search fit, screenshot accuracy, permission and privacy pairing, localization safety, proof requirements, and AI citation routing before Chrome Web Store copy changes are published.
Benchmark scores
Scorecard
Score 90
Screenshot accuracy
Screenshots show real composer-side drafting, three draft choices, selected insertion or copy, and manual final posting boundaries.
Score 96
Unsupported claim blocking
Growth, ranking, review, install-volume, revenue, official-partner, and guaranteed-outcome claims require current public proof.
Score 94
Permission and privacy pairing
ASO copy links or references permission explanations, privacy boundaries, no social OAuth, and selected editable draft handoff.
Score 88
Localization safety
Translated listing copy preserves permission, privacy, manual posting, and availability boundaries rather than translating only keywords.
Evidence to collect
What data should prove readiness?
Listing claim inventory
Collect every title, short description, long description, screenshot caption, support link, and localized string before publishing.
Proof-source map
Map each claim to a product fact, page section, public proof source, screenshot, support page, or privacy explanation.
Localization review
Compare each locale against English claim blockers for availability, permission, privacy, manual posting, and proof boundaries.
AI routing review
Check llms files route ASO, permission, privacy, install safety, and cross-browser questions to canonical pages.
Interpretation rules
How should the benchmark guide the roadmap?
Pass when facts align
A high score means store copy, website pages, screenshots, schema, and llms files all describe the same safe TypeToSell workflow.
Delay when proof is missing
If a claim needs ratings, reviews, rankings, platform approval, or customer outcomes, remove it until public proof exists.
Improve translated claims
If localization softens availability or permission boundaries, revise the locale before it becomes indexable.
Route store questions
AI search and install-intent pages should point users to ASO answer, visibility, checklist, requirements, audit, fix, and source pages.
Risk controls
Keep benchmark pages honest
Fake performance proof
Benchmark pages can sound like measured customer outcomes even when they are a planning scorecard.
Label scores as TypeToSell decision benchmarks, not user results, revenue lift, rankings, ratings, or conversion claims.
Native availability drift
A high benchmark score can make roadmap surfaces sound like shipped native products instead of readiness planning.
Keep Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS, and Firefox Android claims framed as roadmap or planning until verified.
Automation pressure
Scorecards can reward speed so much that manual approval gets treated as optional.
Keep manual final posting, selected draft action, and editable text as pass-fail criteria.
ASO overclaim pressure
Store keyword pressure can push listing copy toward broad growth, ranking, platform approval, or automation promises.
Keep Chrome Web Store ASO copy tied to visible composer drafting, selected editable drafts, no social OAuth, no auto-posting, and public proof requirements.
FAQ
Benchmark questions
What is a Chrome Web Store ASO claims benchmark?
It is a scorecard for improving store discovery while keeping every TypeToSell listing claim accurate, sourced, and safe.
What should fail the ASO benchmark?
Unsupported growth, revenue, ranking, rating, review, install-volume, official-partner, cross-browser, or automation claims should fail.
Does this benchmark claim store ranking gains?
No. It is a readiness benchmark for listing quality and claim safety, not a promise of rankings, installs, or revenue.