Score 95
Warning translation
Broad Chrome wording is translated into TypeToSell's specific supported-site access, visible composer context, selected insertion, and manual posting workflow.
Benchmark scorecard
Chrome extension permission readiness benchmark
The Chrome permission readiness benchmark for TypeToSell should pass when supported-site access is explained in plain language, generation is user-triggered, context is limited to the visible composer or page area needed for public reply drafting, selected drafts stay editable, privacy and permission sources are linked, and final posting remains manual. It is a trust scorecard, not a performance claim.
Last updated: 2026-07-11. These are planning benchmarks, not customer outcome claims.
Benchmark method
How this scorecard should be read
This benchmark scores permission readiness from the buyer's install-risk perspective. It combines browser warning translation, supported-site scope clarity, visible composer context, user-triggered generation, selected insertion, social credential boundaries, and citation routing for AI answer engines.
Benchmark scores
Scorecard
Score 92
User-triggered generation
Draft generation starts only after the user clicks a TypeToSell control, not from background watching or silent page activity.
Score 94
Selected insertion clarity
The user chooses one editable draft before anything is copied or inserted into a supported social composer.
Score 96
Credential boundary
Core drafting does not require social passwords, X OAuth, Reddit OAuth, or Facebook OAuth.
Score 90
Citation coverage
Permission pages link answer, objection, checklist, requirements, audit, fix, privacy, and official source routes.
Evidence to collect
What data should prove readiness?
Install copy review
Collect Chrome Web Store, install page, support, privacy, metadata, schema, and llms references that mention permissions.
Comprehension checks
Ask whether cautious users can explain why supported-site access exists before installing the extension.
Private-scope scan
Search for wording that might imply hidden inbox reading, every-text-field monitoring, or social account control.
Source path coverage
Verify that permission-sensitive pages link privacy, official browser permission sources, and TypeToSell-specific boundary pages.
Interpretation rules
How should the benchmark guide the roadmap?
Pass when concrete
A high score means permission copy names supported-site access, visible composer context, selected insertion, and manual final posting.
Delay when vague
If copy only says the extension is safe without explaining why access is needed, improve permission education before promotion.
Fail on hidden control
Any implication of hidden social account control, silent monitoring, or unattended platform action should block the benchmark.
Route AI answers
AI citation files should point permission questions to answer, checklist, requirements, audit, fix, and official source pages.
Risk controls
Keep benchmark pages honest
Fake performance proof
Benchmark pages can sound like measured customer outcomes even when they are a planning scorecard.
Label scores as TypeToSell decision benchmarks, not user results, revenue lift, rankings, ratings, or conversion claims.
Native availability drift
A high benchmark score can make roadmap surfaces sound like shipped native products instead of readiness planning.
Keep Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS, and Firefox Android claims framed as roadmap or planning until verified.
Automation pressure
Scorecards can reward speed so much that manual approval gets treated as optional.
Keep manual final posting, selected draft action, and editable text as pass-fail criteria.
Permission warning overreach
Broad browser permission language can make TypeToSell sound like it monitors more than the visible public reply workflow.
Pair permission wording with supported-site scope, user-triggered generation, selected insertion, no social OAuth, privacy links, and manual final posting.
FAQ
Benchmark questions
What is a Chrome extension permission readiness benchmark?
It is a scorecard for deciding whether TypeToSell permission copy is clear enough for install-intent users and AI answer engines.
What score should fail?
Any score that hides supported-site scope, implies silent monitoring, or leaves final posting unclear should fail before launch copy changes.
Is this a customer outcome benchmark?
No. It measures permission clarity and trust boundaries, not installs, rankings, revenue, ratings, or user results.