Pre-launch audit

iOS keyboard + Share Extension readiness audit

An iOS keyboard plus Share Extension readiness audit should prove iPhone demand and the need for two complementary surfaces. The Share Extension should help pass visible source context into TypeToSell, while the keyboard or copy fallback should place only the selected editable draft. The audit should fail if raw social content is stored unnecessarily, if App Store availability is implied without proof, or if final posting stops being manual.

Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.

Audit purpose

What this audit should prove

Use this audit before publishing iOS native roadmap content or scoping implementation. It keeps source-context handoff, selected placement, shared storage, copy fallback, and manual approval boundaries visible.

Audit steps

How to run the review

Measure iPhone demand

Separate iPhone mobile web generations, selected copies, return sessions, and iOS-specific friction from total mobile data.

Audit context handoff

Check whether Share Extension flow can capture enough visible source context for specific drafts.

Audit placement fallback

Confirm selected copy remains available when keyboard insertion or target-app behavior is limited.

Audit shared storage

Confirm raw posts, generated replies, private messages, and profile URLs are not persisted unnecessarily in shared storage.

Audit App Store status

Keep iOS keyboard and Share Extension copy in roadmap language until shipped availability is verified.

Pass criteria

What must be true before moving forward?

iPhone demand is proven

Native iOS work follows repeat iPhone mobile web usage, not general excitement about mobile.

Share and keyboard roles are separate

The Share Extension handles source context while keyboard or copy fallback handles selected draft placement.

Storage is minimized

Shared storage should avoid persistent raw social content and keep sensitive context short-lived.

Manual posting remains true

The user still edits and presses the final platform button in the destination social app.

Failure signals

What should block launch or publication?

Auto-posting implication

Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.

Unsupported availability claim

Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.

Outcome proof overreach

Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.

Recommended fixes

How to repair the page or workflow

Split iOS concepts

Rewrite pages so keyboard and Share Extension roles are complementary rather than blurred together.

Add storage boundary copy

State that raw social content should not persist unnecessarily in shared state.

Preserve copy fallback

Make selected copy the reliable fallback when insertion is limited by iOS or target app behavior.

Remove App Store implication

Use roadmap or readiness language until a shipped iOS surface is verified.

FAQ

Audit questions

Why audit iOS keyboard and Share Extension together?

Because a keyboard helps selected draft placement while a Share Extension helps source-context handoff.

What fails the iOS audit?

Weak context handoff, persistent raw social content, no copy fallback, unsupported App Store claims, or auto-posting implications should fail it.

Is the iOS native path live?

This audit is roadmap planning and should not be treated as current App Store availability.