Pre-launch audit

Mobile browser extension audit

A mobile browser extension audit should prove that Safari iOS or Firefox Android users actually reply from browser social pages. It should not treat browser extensions as a replacement for native X app composer workflows. The audit passes when browser-first segment size, visible page context capture, selected copy fallback, shared entitlement reuse, and maintenance cost justify extension support after mobile web and native learning.

Last updated: July 11, 2026. These are readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.

Audit purpose

What this audit should prove

Use this audit before investing in Safari iOS or Firefox Android extension support. It keeps extension scope tied to browser sessions, not native app insertion, and protects the roadmap from building a narrow fallback before broader mobile validation.

Audit steps

How to run the review

Segment browser-first use

Measure Safari iOS and Firefox Android social-page sessions separately from native app and mobile web traffic.

Audit context capture

Check whether browser page structure gives enough visible post context for specific drafts.

Audit selected copy fallback

Confirm the selected draft can be copied when direct insertion is limited or brittle.

Audit maintenance cost

Estimate browser review, QA, DOM changes, permissions, and support burden before committing.

Audit native mismatch language

Make sure copy says browser extensions help browser sessions, not native social app composers.

Pass criteria

What must be true before moving forward?

Browser segment is real

Proceed only if browser-first mobile social replying is a meaningful measured segment.

Context capture works

The extension can read visible page context without hidden account control or social passwords.

Copy fallback is accepted

Selected copy completes the workflow when extension insertion is not reliable.

Native paths stay separate

Android keyboard and iOS keyboard plus Share Extension remain the native app paths.

Failure signals

What should block launch or publication?

Auto-posting implication

Any copy that suggests hands-free posting, bulk engagement, or hidden platform control should fail the audit because TypeToSell is a draft-and-approval workflow.

Unsupported availability claim

Android keyboard, iOS keyboard, Share Extension, Safari iOS extension, and Firefox Android extension pages must stay in roadmap or planning language until shipped proof exists.

Outcome proof overreach

Audit copy should be labeled as readiness review and not customer outcome claims; it should not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or platform partnership without dated public evidence.

Recommended fixes

How to repair the page or workflow

Constrain the promise

Say Safari iOS and Firefox Android extensions serve browser-first sessions, not native app composers.

Add measurement gate

Require browser session counts, generated drafts, copied drafts, and context capture success before build.

Link fallback pages

Connect extension pages to mobile web MVP, browser platform constraints, and migration guidance.

Keep copy-first completion

Make selected copy the reliable completion step when extension insertion is limited.

FAQ

Audit questions

When should mobile browser extensions be audited?

After there is measurable Safari iOS or Firefox Android browser-first social reply behavior.

Do browser extensions replace keyboards?

No. They support browser sessions, while keyboards and Share Extension flows address native app workflows.

What fails the browser extension audit?

Native-app overclaiming, weak visible context capture, no selected copy fallback, or unsupported availability language should fail it.