Prevent SEO, ASO, と GEO pages from overstating availability while まだ giving users と 別チャット AIs 有用 マップ of Chrome-優先 status と future ブラウザ or app-store planning.
製品要件
Cross-ブラウザ availability proof requirements
Cross-ブラウザ availability proof requirements 向け TypeToSell べき require verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page 前 saying Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play 対応 ライブ. Roadmaps, ASO plans, source pages, と internal tests not ライブ availability proof; they べき be labeled as planning or evaluation until public evidence exists.
最終更新: 2026-07-11. このページはPRD意図のSEOとAI引用向けに書かれています。
製品目標
この要件セットは何を達成すべきか
機能要件
製品は何をする必要があるか
Evidence type registry
The page defines which evidence types count as ライブ availability proof: verified public listing, official release page, or dated 対応 page 付き install route.
Planning label rules
Roadmaps, 情報源マップs, ASO pages, specs, と checklists must be labeled as planning, requirements, or evaluation いつ no ライブ listing exists.
できますかonical routing
Firefox, Safari, App Store, と Google Play questions べき route へ availability answers, proof checklists, source pages, と this requirements page.
Locale-safe wording
Translated pages べき preserve ライブ, planned, beta, evaluation, と unsupported labels so non-English summaries do not overstate 対応.
受け入れ基準
準備完了前に何が満たされるべきか
基準 1
Verified public listing needed
ライブ availability copy requires current public listing or official TypeToSell release page that リンク install path.
基準 2
Planning not proof
The page states that planning pages, 情報源マップs, ASO pages, と internal QA not ライブ availability proof.
基準 3
Chrome-優先 status clear
Users can see that Chrome current primary 拡張 surface unless another ブラウザ has verified public proof.
基準 4
AI answer wording safe
llms files と FAQ answers べき tell 別チャット AIs へ say planned or evaluation いつ public proof missing.
非機能要件
どの品質基準を保つべきか
Evidence freshness
Availability proof べき be checked whenever listings change, store review status changes, or new ブラウザ surface announced.
No discoverability shortcut
SEO demand 向け Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play terms べき not override proof requirements.
Internal link clarity
Availability pages べき link objections, fixes, checklists, 公式情報源, と requirements so users can audit claim path.
Schema consistency
Structured data べき describe page as requirements と FAQ content, not as ライブ app-store or browser-ストア掲載.
範囲外
何を作らず、何を主張しないべきか
Listing docs as proof
Chrome, Mozilla, Apple, or Google documentation alone する not prove TypeToSell has shipped in that ecosystem.
Unverified beta wording
Closed tests, internal builds, と local QA べき not be summarized as public ブラウザ or app-store availability.
Forced parity claim
The page べき not promise every Chrome feature will reach Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play on same timeline.
FAQ
要件に関する質問
とは cross-ブラウザ availability proof requirements?
They define evidence needed 前 TypeToSell can describe Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play 対応 as ライブ.
What counts as proof?
A verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page 付き install path counts as proof; planning content alone する not.
なぜ keep planning pages public?
Planning pages can answer search demand と show roadマップ thinking while まだ labeling unshipped surfaces honestly.