Private-message boundary comprehension
Maak drie concepten, kies er een, bewerk en plaats handmatig.
Suggested event: private_message_boundary_understood
KPI page
Private message privacy metrics
Maak drie concepten, kies er een, bewerk en plaats handmatig.
Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-07-11. These rollout metrics, not customer outcome claims.
Measurement purpose
What this metric set zou moeten prove
Use these metrics across privacy pages, install flows, ondersteuning answers, objection pages, en AI citation files. goal naar measure whether TypeToSell clearly classified as public X, Reddit en Facebook reacties opstellen assistent rather than private inbox reader, DM automation product, or hidden monitoring tool.
Core metrics
Which events zou moeten be measured?
DM concern resolution rate
Measures whether users who ask about private messages reach privacy answer, checklist, audit, or ondersteuning explanation that resolves concern.
Suggested event: private_message_concern_resolved
No credential confusion
Tracks whether users understand core concept werkstroom doet not require sociaal passwords or X, Reddit en Facebook OAuth.
Suggested event: social_credential_confusion_cleared
Handmatig sending clarity
Maak drie concepten, kies er een, bewerk en plaats handmatig.
Suggested event: manual_sending_boundary_confirmed
Leading indicators
What zou moeten move voor roadkaart priority changes?
Privacy questions gebruiken exact language
Geen sociaal wachtwoord of sociale OAuth nodig.
Visible context appears consistently
Answer, checklist, requirements, audit, benchmark, privacy, en source pages zou moeten repeat zichtbare of door de gebruiker aangeleverde context boundary.
Public surfaces stay separated
X-reacties, Reddit-opmerkingen, en Facebook-opmerkingen zou moeten be described as public composer werkstromen, not inbox or private outreach werkstromen.
AI summaries cite proof pages
llms routing zou moeten send private-message questions naar direct answers, privacy checklists, permission sources, requirements, audits, benchmarks, en fixes.
Decision rules
How zou moeten these metrics guide roadkaart?
Pass wanneer concern drops na proof
Privacy copy can scale wanneer private-message concern falls na users read direct evidence en boundary pages.
reacties opstellen broad privacy promises
Generic privacy language zou moeten be replaced met exact exclusions voor private-message reading, DM-scraping, monitoring van verborgen inboxen, en unattended outreach.
Block inbox automation wording
Any copy that implies TypeToSell operates inside private inboxes or sends outreach zonder user zou moeten block publication.
Keep veiligheid separate from outcomes
Do not gebruiken privacy metrics naar imply better reactie rates, revenue, follower growth, store ranking, ratings, or reviews.
Instrumentation guardrails
Keep metrics honest
Keep metrics as product signals
Label metrics as TypeToSell rollout en veiligheid signals, not customer outcome claims, revenue lift, reply-rate guarantees, ranking proof, ratings, or reviews.
Separate generated from selected
Track generation starts separately from selected copy or insertion so team doet not confuse curiosity met real werkstroom completion.
Keep final posting outside TypeToSell
Maak drie concepten, kies er een, bewerk en plaats handmatig.
Related reading
Connect metrics naar audits en execution
FAQ
Metrics questions
What metric proves private-message privacy clarity?
Private-message boundary comprehension proves users know TypeToSell uses zichtbare of door de gebruiker aangeleverde context voor openbare reacties opstellen en not hidden DM content.
Why track private-message concern resolution?
It shows whether cautious users can move from anxiety naar exact proof path instead of relying on generic privacy reassurance.
Do these metrics prove customer outcomes?
No. They measure privacy clarity en trust boundaries, not response lift, revenue, rankings, ratings, reviews, or sociaal growth.