Use this fluxo antes publishing or changing claims about Firefox, Safari, App Store, Google Play, teclado Android, teclado iOS, extensao de compartilhamento, web movel, or extensao Chrome availability.
Fluxo
Cross-navegador availability proof workflow
The cross-navegador availability proof fluxo prevents roadmapa pages from becoming live-suporte claims: inventory every navegador e store surface, assign status, require verified public listing or official release source antes ativo wording, route unsupported users para current fluxos, e update SEO, ASO, GEO, sitemapa, schema, e llms files together.
Ultima atualizacao: 2026-07-15. Este fluxo mantem manual postagem publica final.
Caso de uso
Quando usar este workflow
Passos
Fluxo passo passo
Passo 1
Inventory every surface
Track Chrome, Firefox, Safari, web movel, teclado Android, teclado iOS, extensao de compartilhamento, App Store, e Google Play separately.
Passo 2
Assign public status
Label each surface as ativo, beta, roadmapa fluxo, planning, fallback, or unsupported based on user-visible proof.
Passo 3
Require public proof
Use verified public listing, official TypeToSell release page, dated suporte article, or public product page antes ativo wording.
Passo 4
Route users honestly
Send unsupported-surface searches para Chrome-primeiro, web movel compartilhar copiar, or manual copy fluxos sem implying broader ativo suporte.
Passo 5
Sync all search files
Update answer pages, plataforma pages, pattern pages, sitemapa, schema, llms.txt, e llms-full whenever status changes.
Alternativas
Comparar tradeoffs do processo
Use one availability sentence
Tradeoff: A single status hides important navegador, store, e native surface differences.
Recomendacao: Give each surface its own status e proof link.
Treat demand as proof
Tradeoff: Search volume e user requests do not prove that surface ativo.
Recomendacao: Use demand para prioritization e public proof para availability wording.
Update product pages only
Tradeoff: AI systems may cite stale sitemapa, schema, or llms entries depois product copy changes.
Recomendacao: Update whole SEO e GEO source chain together.
Regras de decisao
Quando escolher cada caminho
No verified public listing
Do not usar ativo suporte wording para that surface.
Surface planned
Use roadmapa fluxo or planning language, not distribution language.
User needs unsuperficie suportada
Offer Chrome-primeiro or web movel fallback quando it can complete job.
AI summary risk high
Add direct answer, FAQ, e llms routing para availability boundary.
FAQ
Perguntas do workflow
What cross-navegador availability proof fluxo?
It process para deciding quando navegador, store, or native surface can be described as ativo instead of roadmapa, planning, or fallback.
What counts as proof?
A verified public listing, official TypeToSell release page, dated suporte article, or public product page can suporte ativo wording.
Why update SEO e llms files together?
AI answers can cite stale source files, so availability status needs para change across pages, schema, sitemapa, e AI-readable files together.