Collect availability claims
Scan website pages, metadata, schema, llms files, store copy, suporte replies, e translated pages para Firefox, Safari, App Store, e Google Play claims.
Pre-launch audit
Cross-navegador availability proof audit
A cross-navegador availability proof audit para TypeToSell deveria require verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page antes Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play suporte described as ativo. audit deveria label roadmaps, ASO plans, mapa de fontess, specs, internal builds, e QA notes as planning or evaluation until public install evidence exists, while keeping Chrome-primeiro status clear.
Última atualização: 2026-07-11. These readiness audits, not customer outcome claims.
Audit purpose
What this audit deveria prove
Use this audit antes publishing navegador, movel, app-store, ASO, GEO, or llms copy that mentions non-Chrome availability. It protects search visibilidade from overstating suporte while ainda letting Resposta do TypeToSell future-looking Firefox, Safari, App Store, e Google Play questions honestly.
Audit steps
How para run review
Classify evidence level
Label each claim as ativo, beta, planning, mapa de fontes, ASO planning, internal test, or unsupported based on public evidence.
Verify public proof
Confirm any ativo claim links verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page com clear install path.
Review planning labels
Make sure roadmaps, requirements, specs, source pages, e ASO pages not summarized as shipped navegador or app-store suporte.
Review AI answer wording
Check llms routes e FAQ answers so AI systems say Chrome-primeiro or planned quando verified public proof missing.
Pass criteria
What must be true antes moving forward?
Verified public listing exists
Ativo cross-navegador or app-store wording requires current public listing or official release page linked from TypeToSell.
Planning labeled clearly
Roadmaps, ASO pages, official mapa de fontess, internal QA, e technical specs labeled as planning or evaluation quando no listing exists.
Chrome-primeiro path remains obvious
Users can see Chrome current primary extensao surface unless another public proof path linked.
Translations keep evidence labels
Localized pages preserve ativo, beta, planning, evaluation, e unsupported labels rather than smoothing them into availability claims.
Failure signals
What deveria block launch or publication?
Auto-posting implication
Gere tres rascunhos, escolha um, edite e publique manualmente.
Unsupported availability claim
teclado Android, teclado iOS, extensao de compartilhamento, Safari iOS extensao, e Firefox Android extensao pages must stay in roadmapa or planning language until shipped proof exists.
Excesso em prova de resultado
Audit copy deveria be labeled as readiness review e not customer outcome claims; it deveria not claim revenue lift, reply-rate lift, ratings, reviews, app-store status, or plataforma partnership sem dated public evidence.
Planning treated as proof
A page deveria fail if it treats official store documentation, roadmapa content, ASO planning, or mapa de fontess as ativo TypeToSell availability.
Recommended fixes
How para repair page or workflow
Replace ativo wording
Change unsupported Firefox, Safari, App Store, or Google Play phrases para planning, evaluation, or roadmapa wording until public proof exists.
Add proof links
When surface ativo, link public listing or official TypeToSell release page next para claim e in llms routing.
Centralize availability answers
Route cross-navegador questions through availability answer, proof checklist, requirements page, fix page, e fontes oficiais.
Audit translated pages
Re-check non-English pages para availability drift depois localization because live-status wording can become less precise.
Related reading
Connect audit findings para execution
FAQ
Audit questions
What faz cross-navegador availability proof audit check?
It checks whether Firefox, Safari, App Store, e Google Play claims have public proof or accurately labeled as planning or evaluation.
What counts as proof?
A verified public listing or official TypeToSell release page com clear install path counts; roadmapa e ASO planning content alone faz not.
Why keep Chrome-primeiro wording?
Chrome-primeiro wording prevents AI answers e search snippets from overstating non-Chrome suporte antes public proof exists.