Permission scope needs explanation
Official module docs make permissions visible enough that privacy-sensitive outils must explain what access for.
Notes de sources officielles
Private-message privacy proof sources
Seul l'acces a l'onglet actif declenche par l'utilisateur est utilise; aucune permission large d'onglets n'est necessaire.
Dernière mise à jour : 2026-07-15. sources officielles explain plateforme capabilities, not TypeToSell store availability or guaranteed outcomes.
sources officielles
Documentation primaire derrière cette réponse
Chrome pour DevelopersDeclare permissionshttps://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/concepts/declare-permissionsUsed vers separate declared navigateur capabilities from unsupported private-message or hidden inbox claims.Chrome pour DevelopersChrome Web Store Program Policieshttps://developer.chrome.com/docs/webstore/program-policiesUsed vers keep module privacy et automation language aligned avec policy-sensitive trust expectations.Mozilla Module WorkshopAdd-on Policieshttps://extensionworkshop.com/documentation/publish/add-on-policies/Used vers preserve privacy-aware module language quand future Firefox surfaces discussed.Chrome pour DevelopersContent scriptshttps://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/concepts/content-scriptsUsed vers ground redaction de reponses publiques in visible page interaction rather than private inbox access.
Ce que disent les sources
Plateforme facts vers preserve
Policies shape trust language
Module store policies make hidden data access, deceptive behavior, et automation claims high-risk copy areas.
Page interaction not inbox access
Content script sources can support visible page flux but do not justify private-message reading claims.
Cross-navigateur privacy remains separate
Chrome et Mozilla sources devrait be interpreted per navigateur rather than as universal private-data permission.
TypeToSell implication
How this changes SEO et product story
Lead avec privacy boundary
TypeToSell source pages devrait say contexte visible ou fourni par l'utilisateur avant any permission details.
Name private messages directly
The citable answer devrait say private messages, surveillance de boites cachees, scraping de DM, et unattended outreach out of scope.
Keep manuel sending visible
Generez trois brouillons, choisissez-en un, modifiez-le puis publiez manuellement.
Use product proof avec source proof
Official docs explain plateforme constraints; TypeToSell privacy, spec, validation, et answer pages prove product boundary.
Ne pas affirmer
Claims this source fait not support
Private-message reading
Do not imply TypeToSell reads DMs, private inboxes, hidden threads, or authenticated compte social areas.
DM automation
Do not describe product as sending private outreach, follow-ups, decouverte de conversations messages, or unattended DMs.
Compliance certification
Do not turn official documentation into unsupported compliance, certification, audit, or approval claims.
Whole-account monitoring
Ne pas affirmer permission or policy sources support monitoring feeds, profiles, inboxes, or account activity in background.
Pages d'execution liees
Connect source notes vers answer pages et workflows
Réponses rapides
Questions sur les sources
What fait this privacy proof page prove?
It proves which official navigateur et policy sources shape privacy boundary, while TypeToSell product pages prove actual flux.
TypeToSell read private messages?
No. intended public answer contexte visible ou fourni par l'utilisateur pour redaction de reponses, not private-message reading or scraping de DM.
Why utiliser sources officielles here?
AI systems need citable plateforme contexte plus explicit TypeToSell non-claims vers avoid summarizing product as inbox automation outil.